Policy and Procedure Recommendations (PPR) Portal

The New York City Department of Investigation’s Policy and Procedure Recommendations (PPR) Portal provides the public with a greater understanding of the recommendations DOI issues to City agencies and entities. PPRs are formal written recommendations to City agencies that correct policy, procedural and operational vulnerabilities identified through DOI investigations. These PPRs are part of DOI’s distinct approach to attacking corruption: through prevention, education, arrests, public reports, and reforms that tighten internal controls and prevent fraud and corruption from re-occurring. PPRs help improve the efficiency and effectiveness of City government, defend the City from fraudulent activity, and protect City workers and the public from conditions that could affect health and safety. This dataset pulls the most recent information from DOIs PPR portal, available on their website.

City Government Department of Investigation (DOI) Dataset jstn-jaut 7 fields
DOWNLOAD CSV
Dataset fields
Showing 50 real records
DOC
Agency: DOC • Date Issued: 2015-01-15T00:00:00.000 • Recommendation: DOC should eliminate cargo pockets from CO uniform pants
Agency
DOC
Date Issued
2015-01-15T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
DOC should eliminate cargo pockets from CO uniform pants
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2018-03-01T00:00:00.000
DOC
Agency: DOC • Date Issued: 2015-01-15T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
DOC
Date Issued
2015-01-15T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
DOC should meet with DCAS to update the language in the Correction Officer NOE. These updates should include any new automatically disqualifying criteria developed by DOC, and be tailored, as necessary, to specific corruption vulnerabilities unique to the agency. Implementing this list and using strict criteria to eliminate certain candidates immediately would allow AIU to devote resources to the background investigations of truly qualified candidates
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2016-01-19T00:00:00.000
DOC
Agency: DOC • Date Issued: 2015-01-15T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
DOC
Date Issued
2015-01-15T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
DOC should explore reasonable structural changes to the facilities in order to place CO lockers outside of security gates
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
No
DOC
Agency: DOC • Date Issued: 2015-01-15T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
DOC
Date Issued
2015-01-15T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
DOC should reestablish its Recruitment Unit. This Unit should advertise and recruit aggressively, especially at law enforcement oriented schools, and should ensure that its recruitment materials and website are accessible and professional. In addition, DOC should resume participation in the Law Enforcement Exploring program.
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2015-04-08T00:00:00.000
DOC
Agency: DOC • Date Issued: 2015-01-15T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
DOC
Date Issued
2015-01-15T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
DOC should adopt automatic disqualifying factors, including the conviction of certain crimes, with a goal to eliminate unqualified applicants as quickly and efficiently as possible. Once it becomes clear that a candidate lacks the “good character” required of a CO, such as felony convictions or dishonorable discharge from the armed forces, case coordinators should have the discretion to reject the applicant as “not qualified” without going through the entire process.
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2015-08-05T00:00:00.000
DOC
Agency: DOC • Date Issued: 2015-01-15T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
DOC
Date Issued
2015-01-15T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
DOC should expand its list of potential disqualifying factors to include corruption risks unique to DOC. For instance, DOC should list financial instability because it makes a CO vulnerable to accepting bribes in exchange for contraband smuggling. It
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2016-01-19T00:00:00.000
DOC
Agency: DOC • Date Issued: 2015-01-15T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
DOC
Date Issued
2015-01-15T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
DOC should have a more thorough applicant review process. DOC should adopt a system, comparable to the NYPD APD, in which each applicant must pass through multiple levels of review, by both civilian and uniformed staff, before being approved by a panel of executives.
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2016-01-19T00:00:00.000
DOC
Agency: DOC • Date Issued: 2015-01-15T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
DOC
Date Issued
2015-01-15T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
AIU should create a standard detailed checklist identifying all documents that it requires applicants to submit and all AIU investigative steps necessary to complete the background investigation. This, along with a new computer system, should help ensure that all required information is obtained for every applicant.
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2016-01-19T00:00:00.000
DOC
Agency: DOC • Date Issued: 2015-01-15T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
DOC
Date Issued
2015-01-15T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
DOC should ensure that all case coordinators are using IFCOM as an investigative tool. Specifically, not only should DOC check IFCOM databases for telephone contact with inmates, but it should listen to the recorded telephone calls between the inmate and the applicant. The identification of an applicant’s phone number in the inmate database is concerning, and only a review of the content of these calls will allow DOC to determine the extent of the relationship and whether it should disqualify the candidate.
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2015-03-12T00:00:00.000
DOC
Agency: DOC • Date Issued: 2015-01-15T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
DOC
Date Issued
2015-01-15T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
DOC should implement standardized training for case coordinators in investigative and interview techniques, to explain the application process, to teach them to use computer databases and other law enforcement tools, and to provide guidance on appropriate hiring recommendations. In particular, gang identification and disqualifying factors related to gang activity must be part of the training course as this type of affiliation by a CO presents a serious threat to the safety and security of DOC facilities. The NYPD APD’s two week training course for investigators with follow-up refresher courses provides one effective model.
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2015-03-12T00:00:00.000
DOC
Agency: DOC • Date Issued: 2015-01-15T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
DOC
Date Issued
2015-01-15T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
DOC, using the NYPD APD system as a model, should computerize its applicant file review system. At present, all AIU files are paper based, and many that DOI reviewed were incomplete. Computerization would enhance DOC’s ability to store and access information, and ensure that a standard process is followed for every applicant. Additionally, an electronic application questionnaire similar to that used by NYPD would prevent applicants from advancing in the process without filling out required information and allow AIU to develop useful statistical information to help guide its hiring practices.
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2016-01-19T00:00:00.000
DOC
Agency: DOC • Date Issued: 2015-01-15T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
DOC
Date Issued
2015-01-15T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
DOC must engage in a more rigorous review of the psychological testing presently employed.
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2016-01-19T00:00:00.000
DOC
Agency: DOC • Date Issued: 2015-01-15T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
DOC
Date Issued
2015-01-15T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
Decisions by supervisors, especially the Director and Deputy Commissioner that overrule the judgment of subordinates, must be explained in writing.
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2016-01-19T00:00:00.000
DOC
Agency: DOC • Date Issued: 2015-01-15T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
DOC
Date Issued
2015-01-15T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
DOC must have a system in place to proactively monitor applicants who are hired but are considered vulnerable to corruption.
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2016-01-19T00:00:00.000
DOC
Agency: DOC • Date Issued: 2015-01-15T00:00:00.000 • Recommendation: Placement of Canine Units at the staff entrance gates to screen CO's for drugs
Agency
DOC
Date Issued
2015-01-15T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
Placement of Canine Units at the staff entrance gates to screen CO's for drugs
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2015-06-18T00:00:00.000
DOC
Agency: DOC • Date Issued: 2015-01-15T00:00:00.000 • Recommendation: Assign Special Operations Division to oversee security at staff entrances
Agency
DOC
Date Issued
2015-01-15T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
Assign Special Operations Division to oversee security at staff entrances
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2016-10-18T00:00:00.000
DOC
Agency: DOC • Date Issued: 2015-01-15T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: DOI Withdrawn/Suspended
Agency
DOC
Date Issued
2015-01-15T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
Consideration of upgrading of search protocols to the standard employed by the Transportation Security Administration.
Acceptance Status
DOI Withdrawn/Suspended
Implementation Status
DOI Withdrawn/Suspended
DOC
Agency: DOC • Date Issued: 2015-01-15T00:00:00.000 • Recommendation: DOC should eliminate cargo pockets from CO uniform pants
Agency
DOC
Date Issued
2015-01-15T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
DOC should eliminate cargo pockets from CO uniform pants
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2018-03-01T00:00:00.000
DOC
Agency: DOC • Date Issued: 2015-01-15T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: DOI Withdrawn/Suspended
Agency
DOC
Date Issued
2015-01-15T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
DOC should explore reasonable structural changes to the facilities in order to place CO lockers outside of security gates
Acceptance Status
DOI Withdrawn/Suspended
Implementation Status
DOI Withdrawn/Suspended
DOC
Agency: DOC • Date Issued: 2015-01-15T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
DOC
Date Issued
2015-01-15T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
DOC should reestablish its Recruitment Unit. This Unit should advertise and recruit aggressively, especially at law enforcement oriented schools, and should ensure that its recruitment materials and website are accessible and professional. In addition, DOC should resume participation in the Law Enforcement Exploring program.
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2015-04-08T00:00:00.000
DOC
Agency: DOC • Date Issued: 2015-01-15T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
DOC
Date Issued
2015-01-15T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
DOC should adopt automatic disqualifying factors, including the conviction of certain crimes, with a goal to eliminate unqualified applicants as quickly and efficiently as possible. Once it becomes clear that a candidate lacks the “good character” required of a CO, such as felony convictions or dishonorable discharge from the armed forces, case coordinators should have the discretion to reject the applicant as “not qualified” without going through the entire process.
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2015-08-05T00:00:00.000
DOC
Agency: DOC • Date Issued: 2015-01-15T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
DOC
Date Issued
2015-01-15T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
DOC should expand its list of potential disqualifying factors to include corruption risks unique to DOC. For instance, DOC should list financial instability because it makes a CO vulnerable to accepting bribes in exchange for contraband smuggling. It
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2016-01-19T00:00:00.000
DOC
Agency: DOC • Date Issued: 2015-01-15T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
DOC
Date Issued
2015-01-15T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
DOC should meet with DCAS to update the language in the Correction Officer NOE. These updates should include any new automatically disqualifying criteria developed by DOC, and be tailored, as necessary, to specific corruption vulnerabilities unique to the agency. Implementing this list and using strict criteria to eliminate certain candidates immediately would allow AIU to devote resources to the background investigations of truly qualified candidates
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2016-01-19T00:00:00.000
DOC
Agency: DOC • Date Issued: 2015-01-15T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
DOC
Date Issued
2015-01-15T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
DOC should have a more thorough applicant review process. DOC should adopt a system, comparable to the NYPD APD, in which each applicant must pass through multiple levels of review, by both civilian and uniformed staff, before being approved by a panel of executives.
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2016-01-19T00:00:00.000
DOC
Agency: DOC • Date Issued: 2015-01-15T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
DOC
Date Issued
2015-01-15T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
AIU should create a standard detailed checklist identifying all documents that it requires applicants to submit and all AIU investigative steps necessary to complete the background investigation. This, along with a new computer system, should help ensure that all required information is obtained for every applicant.
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2016-01-19T00:00:00.000
DOC
Agency: DOC • Date Issued: 2015-01-15T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
DOC
Date Issued
2015-01-15T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
DOC should ensure that all case coordinators are using IFCOM as an investigative tool. Specifically, not only should DOC check IFCOM databases for telephone contact with inmates, but it should listen to the recorded telephone calls between the inmate and the applicant. The identification of an applicant’s phone number in the inmate database is concerning, and only a review of the content of these calls will allow DOC to determine the extent of the relationship and whether it should disqualify the candidate.
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2015-03-12T00:00:00.000
DOC
Agency: DOC • Date Issued: 2015-01-15T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
DOC
Date Issued
2015-01-15T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
DOC should implement standardized training for case coordinators in investigative and interview techniques, to explain the application process, to teach them to use computer databases and other law enforcement tools, and to provide guidance on appropriate hiring recommendations. In particular, gang identification and disqualifying factors related to gang activity must be part of the training course as this type of affiliation by a CO presents a serious threat to the safety and security of DOC facilities. The NYPD APD’s two week training course for investigators with follow-up refresher courses provides one effective model.
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2015-03-12T00:00:00.000
DOC
Agency: DOC • Date Issued: 2015-01-15T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
DOC
Date Issued
2015-01-15T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
DOC, using the NYPD APD system as a model, should computerize its applicant file review system. At present, all AIU files are paper based, and many that DOI reviewed were incomplete. Computerization would enhance DOC’s ability to store and access information, and ensure that a standard process is followed for every applicant. Additionally, an electronic application questionnaire similar to that used by NYPD would prevent applicants from advancing in the process without filling out required information and allow AIU to develop useful statistical information to help guide its hiring practices.
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2016-01-19T00:00:00.000
DOC
Agency: DOC • Date Issued: 2015-01-15T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
DOC
Date Issued
2015-01-15T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
DOC must engage in a more rigorous review of the psychological testing presently employed.
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2016-01-19T00:00:00.000
DOC
Agency: DOC • Date Issued: 2015-01-15T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
DOC
Date Issued
2015-01-15T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
Decisions by supervisors, especially the Director and Deputy Commissioner that overrule the judgment of subordinates, must be explained in writing.
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2016-01-19T00:00:00.000
DOC
Agency: DOC • Date Issued: 2015-01-15T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
DOC
Date Issued
2015-01-15T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
DOC must have a system in place to proactively monitor applicants who are hired but are considered vulnerable to corruption.
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2016-01-19T00:00:00.000
DoITT
Agency: DoITT • Date Issued: 2015-02-06T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
DoITT
Date Issued
2015-02-06T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
The City must appoint a Program Manager empowered by the Mayor to lead large-scale technology projects such as ECTP.
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2015-06-03T00:00:00.000
DoITT
Agency: DoITT • Date Issued: 2015-02-06T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
DoITT
Date Issued
2015-02-06T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
The City should retain an independent integrity monitor for large scale technology projects.
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2015-06-03T00:00:00.000
DoITT
Agency: DoITT • Date Issued: 2015-02-06T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
DoITT
Date Issued
2015-02-06T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
The City should implement standardized record keeping practices on large-scale, multi-agency technology projects.
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2015-06-03T00:00:00.000
DoITT
Agency: DoITT • Date Issued: 2015-02-06T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
DoITT
Date Issued
2015-02-06T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
The Program Manager should have the authority to make final determinations regarding technology and other project decisions after receiving input from stakeholder agencies.
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2015-06-03T00:00:00.000
DoITT
Agency: DoITT • Date Issued: 2015-02-06T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
DoITT
Date Issued
2015-02-06T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
The Program Manager must also adequately involve and consult representatives from the key stakeholder agencies.
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2015-06-03T00:00:00.000
DoITT
Agency: DoITT • Date Issued: 2015-02-06T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
DoITT
Date Issued
2015-02-06T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
Agencies, including the NYPD, should create a document retention policy for ECTP and future large-scale technology projects.
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2015-06-03T00:00:00.000
DoITT
Agency: DoITT • Date Issued: 2015-02-06T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
DoITT
Date Issued
2015-02-06T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
Large-scale projects should assign an individual or unit the responsibility of tracking all costs.
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2015-06-03T00:00:00.000
DoITT
Agency: DoITT • Date Issued: 2015-02-06T00:00:00.000 • Recommendation: Where possible, the City should avoid layers of subcontracting.
Agency
DoITT
Date Issued
2015-02-06T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
Where possible, the City should avoid layers of subcontracting.
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2015-06-03T00:00:00.000
DoITT
Agency: DoITT • Date Issued: 2015-02-06T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
DoITT
Date Issued
2015-02-06T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
The City should avoid ceding complete responsibility over projects to outside contractors.
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2015-06-03T00:00:00.000
DoITT
Agency: DoITT • Date Issued: 2015-02-06T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
DoITT
Date Issued
2015-02-06T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
Reporting criteria should be disseminated to Program staff responsible for drafting the reports.
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2015-06-03T00:00:00.000
DoITT
Agency: DoITT • Date Issued: 2015-02-06T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: N/A
Agency
DoITT
Date Issued
2015-02-06T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
The City – specifically OMB – should adopt criteria for classifying and tracking program costs that seeks to fully document the costs of delivering the program and its sub-projects.
Acceptance Status
N/A
Implementation Status
N/A
Agency Reported Status
Not applicable
DoITT
Agency: DoITT • Date Issued: 2015-02-06T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
DoITT
Date Issued
2015-02-06T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
Where possible, the City should establish direct contractual relationships with vendors.
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2015-06-03T00:00:00.000
DoITT
Agency: DoITT • Date Issued: 2015-02-06T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
DoITT
Date Issued
2015-02-06T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
The City should set forth written criteria for any reporting of ratings or metrics intended to measure the progress of the Program or particular projects.
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2015-06-03T00:00:00.000
DoITT
Agency: DoITT • Date Issued: 2015-02-06T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
DoITT
Date Issued
2015-02-06T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
Reporting should not take so much time and effort as to detract from staff’s ability to perform substantive Program work.
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2015-06-03T00:00:00.000
DoITT
Agency: DoITT • Date Issued: 2015-02-06T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
DoITT
Date Issued
2015-02-06T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
The City should account for all costs relating to large-scale technology programs like ECTP as costs of the program.
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2015-06-03T00:00:00.000
DOB
Agency: DOB • Date Issued: 2015-02-06T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Practice Already in Place
Agency
DOB
Date Issued
2015-02-06T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
DOB should consider implementing a new policy, procedure, protocol designed to ensure that employees assigned to NBAT (or any other unit) are engaged in work within the jurisdiction of the office or unit to which they are assigned and, by implication, are not engaged in potentially criminal activities.
Acceptance Status
Practice Already in Place
Implementation Status
Practice Already in Place
Agency Reported Status
Agency self-reported practice already in place
DOB
Agency: DOB • Date Issued: 2015-02-06T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
DOB
Date Issued
2015-02-06T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
DOB should consider implementing a new policy, procedure, protocol to require that separate inspectors attempt to gain access to properties on the two occasions, thereby providing an additional check upon the integrity of the complaint investigation process.
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Date Implemented
2015-04-16T00:00:00.000
Agency Reported Status
Alternate measures implemented
DOB
Agency: DOB • Date Issued: 2015-02-06T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Practice Already in Place
Agency
DOB
Date Issued
2015-02-06T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
DOB should consider implementing a new policy, procedure, protocol to ensure that, in instances where a supervisory inspector conducts an underlying construction inspection, that supervisor is rendered impotent to review his own inspection, thereby requiring the approval of a higher ranking supervisor.
Acceptance Status
Practice Already in Place
Implementation Status
Practice Already in Place
Agency Reported Status
Agency self-reported practice already in place
HPD
Agency: HPD • Date Issued: 2015-02-06T00:00:00.000 • Acceptance Status: Accepted
Agency
HPD
Date Issued
2015-02-06T00:00:00.000
Recommendation
HPD should consider implementing a new policy, procedure, protocol to ensure the impossibility of dismissing a violation without the affected property owner having complied with all prerequisites to its dismissal.
Acceptance Status
Accepted
Implementation Status
Yes
Agency Reported Status
Alternate measures implemented